|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 06:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Would this not work better?
Co-Processor Of the Tiger Co-Processor Of the Bear Co-Processor Of the Gorilla Co-Processor Of the Boar Co-Processor Of the Monkey Co-Processor Of the Falcon Co-Processor Of the Wolf Co-Processor Of the Tiger Co-Processor Of the Eagle Co-Processor Of the Whale Co-Processor Of the Owl |
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 09:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
Marox Calendale wrote:How is this new "All named modules are meta 1 modules" concept working with T2 BPC Invention, as at the moment the Meta 4 Modules grant higher chances for a successful invention than meta 1 - 3 do?
Read this Dev Blog http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/lighting-the-invention-bulb/
The part about "Merging Invention with Reverse Engineering" near the bottom.
It comes down to meta items will no longer be a part of the invention process. At least if I'm reading it right. |
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 09:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Marox Calendale wrote:Emiko Rowna wrote:Marox Calendale wrote:How is this new "All named modules are meta 1 modules" concept working with T2 BPC Invention, as at the moment the Meta 4 Modules grant higher chances for a successful invention than meta 1 - 3 do? Read this Dev Blog http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/lighting-the-invention-bulb/The part about "Merging Invention with Reverse Engineering" near the bottom. It comes down to meta items will no longer be a part of the invention process. At least if I'm reading it right. Ah thanks, forgot that. But if I am right, Invention revamp is not coming with oceanus or is it? So what will happen to Light Missiles Launchers for example, as they change to tiericide in oceanus but the T2 Invention revamp will be probably later?
Now that is a very good question. Let us hope a Dev will bring a very good answer.
|
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 09:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
"We will convert every module of one type into modules of another type, everywhere in the database. This includes modules currently fit to ships and modules in containers or contracts."
With respect to reprocessing, will I be losing any value related to the minerals output? |
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 10:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
So how will this impact my saved fittings? Will the modules names in my saved fittings be changed to the new modules names? |
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 19:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:Two questions:
1. Where exactly is the logic in Meta 5, 6, etc. if there is no Meta 2, 3 and 4?
2. Until now, when newbies have asked what to do with all their unwanted loot, the answer has generally been "sell Meta 4 and above, reprocess everything else" - so what will be the advice now?
For #1, I think it is a way to get things into loot tables.
and
For #2, give everything to me. |
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 05:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
Marek Walerian wrote:Looks like all 16 pages have been in vain. The fact that there are no blue dev posts other than on the first page coupled with the next patch being released tomorrow reinforces that fact. Looks like the new names are soon to be in. It is a really sad day in Eve On a side note, I have been playing around with new pvp Helios.. err.. i mean "Frigate of the Bear" fit and want your opinion. Friagte of the Bear Damage Control of the Bear Magnetic Field Stabilizer of the Bear Micro Auxiliary Power Core of the Bear Warp Scrambler of the Bear Tracking Disruptor of the Bear 1MN Afterburner of the Bear 150mm Railgun of the Bear 150mm Railgun of the Bear Small Auxiliary Thrusters of the Bear Small Hybrid Collision Accelerator of the Bear Small Drone of the Bear Let me know what you guys think.
I look forward to trying this out!
I still have not seem an answer to the question I asked pages ago.
As these names change, will my saved fittings be updated? The Dev Blog did not say this was going to be part of the process. I just don't want to find out I will need to go through every saved fitting and update them myself.
|
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 18:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:Shin Dari wrote:DireNecessity wrote: Will drop rates be adjusted to make named modules rare enough to be more valuable/expensive than player produced meta 0 modules or is the thinking that Tech II manufacturing provides sufficient demand for player produced meta 0 modules and thus thereGÇÖs no need to create even more demand for them by making them sensible options in their own right?
DireNecessity
Rarity is a very poor balancing tool in Eve Online, it hardly ever works. I think that the solution is to have named modules be fabricated by players. This is one of the stated long-term goals of CCP, to have everything be fabricated by players. I think that now is the time to actually do it. In the current situation manufactures and mission runners are competing against each other and not working with each other. Have mission runners provide the components/materials and allow the industrialists to make the named modules. hmmm.. named mods instead of dropping in missions being made instead by manufacturers makes sense ... so combat missions could just be compensated with bigger bounties .. which makes sense .. it should be about the combat rather than salvaging and looting and then having too move the stuff too sell it..
They could drop parts to build the named mod with. |
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 03:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Hey guys. Thanks for the feedback so far.
We're doing some discussion internally about the concerns some people have expressed about the naming. I will say that we absolutely reject any argument that attempts to claim that obscure name memorization should somehow be a requirement to play EVE. ...
Thanks.
So how long before you apply this thought process to the ship names? I can't wait to see what the new names might look like.
Scoped Frigate, anyone?
|
Emiko Rowna
Aliastra Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 04:08:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote:Hmm.... looking at co-processors....
After rebalancing: T1 co-processors -> 1.08x CPU Upgraded co-processor -> 1.09x CPU T2 co-processors -> 1.10x CPU
They all require 1MW of PG. Clearly, T2 is always better than Upgraded, which is always better than T1.
So, exactly when would I want to use a T1 or even an Upgraded co-processor, instead of a T2 co-processor?
Because of cost or availability, you say?
In Rens: T1 co-processors cost about 50K ISK. T2 co-processors cost about 800K ISK. Meta co-processors before recent speculation were actually cheaper than T1 - now, they cost more than T1, but still substantially less than T2 (except for the ones which no longer drop - let's ignore them, since they are generally just collector's items). Let's say 150K ISK for Upgraded.
Supply isn't an issue - there are plenty of co-processors available.
Is there really anyone, say at least one month old, who cannot always afford 800K ISK for the T2 version?
Ok, now assume that 800K ISK really is too much for some players.
If the Upgraded price drops again below the T1 price, then it is a no-brainer - every poor player will always buy the Upgraded rather than T1.
How about if it is 150K for the Upgraded vs. 50K for the T1? How many poor players still can't afford the extra 100K ISK to get the Upgraded version? Somehow, I just don't think there are many players who are that space poor.
So, when exactly would anyone use the T1 version?
Never and I'm starting to think that is the idea. Making one think this are options but there are none. Fitting get real easy then.
|
|
|
|
|